Table 4.
Comparison of universal health coverage costing studies since 2015
Stenberg et al, 201711 | Moses et al, 201922 | Current study, 2020 | |
---|---|---|---|
Definition of UHC | Achievement of normative levels of health workforce and facility density and high coverage (eg, 95% in the most ambitious scale-up scenario) of 187 health interventions | Achievement of target rates of utilisation of inpatient and outpatient services, relative to country disease burden | Achievement of 80% coverage of 218 essential health interventions in a model HBP |
Countries included in analysis | 67 LICs and MICs representing 95% of the total population of these country income groups | 188 countries for which utilisation rates and health spending were modelled as part of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 | 83 LICs and lower-MICs (total population of these two income groups; costs estimated separately for each income group) |
Costing method | Microcosting (ingredients approach for all health interventions and related programmes) | Gross costing (ie, average expenditure per outpatient or inpatient visit as calculated from NHA data | Mixed: unit costs for direct service delivery taken from microcosting studies, with health system costs added from gross costing studies |
Included costs | Direct service delivery costs of interventions and related health system strengthening costs, including costs of reaching target workforce and facility density | All components of care measured in outpatient and inpatient expenditure per NHA data (including ancillary services); frontier analysis used to identify most efficient spending per visit | Direct service delivery costs of interventions and related health system strengthening costs |
Time horizon; currency-year | Scale-up of services from current levels to target levels over 2016–30; 2014 US dollars | Counterfactual estimate for 2016 applying unit cost data (from frontier analysis) to all countries; 2017 international dollars | Counterfactual estimate for 2015 (cost of 80% coverage vs actual coverage); 2016 US dollars |
Main findings | In the scenario with greatest progress towards UHC, an additional US$370 billion annually would be required across all LICs and MICs, or population-weighted mean total health-care spending of US$270 per capita | 161 countries would require a total of Int$580 billion to Int$1·2 trillion (depending on choice of country standard) to meet target utilisation rates | An additional US$310 billion annually would be required across LICs and lower-MICs, or population-weighted mean total cost of US$120 per capita |
UHC=universal health coverage. HBP=health benefits package. LIC=low-income country. Lower-MIC=lower-middle-income country. NHA=US National Health Accounts.