Table 3.
Computational performance achieved by the implemented methods in terms of processing times and memory consumption for the HGSOC CT scan (considering a large POD lesion) selected as a practical use case.
| Method | Processing time [s] | Memory [GB] |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed thresholding | 0.1345 | 1.0185 |
| Two-stage Otsu | 1.8046 | 1.0170 |
| Silhouette + -means |
( mins) |
1.0498 |
| CH + -means | 17.9152 | 1.0498 |
| DB + -means | 18.1542 | 1.5718 |
| Gap + -means |
( mins) |
1.0478 |
| sFCM | 18.4728 | 1.0246 |
| sFCM | 25.3067 | 1.0246 |
| sFCM | 24.7146 | 1.0246 |
| ksFCM | 31.4829 | 1.0246 |
| ksFCM | 52.5809 | 1.0246 |
| ksFCM | 51.1077 | 1.0246 |