Skip to main content
. 2020 May;120:103751. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103751

Table 3.

Computational performance achieved by the implemented methods in terms of processing times and memory consumption for the HGSOC CT scan (considering a large POD lesion) selected as a practical use case.

Method Processing time [s] Memory [GB]
Fixed thresholding 0.1345 1.0185
Two-stage Otsu 1.8046 1.0170
Silhouette + K-means 1.4200×103
(=23.667 mins)
1.0498
CH + K-means 17.9152 1.0498
DB + K-means 18.1542 1.5718
Gap + K-means 2.0796×103
(=34.66 mins)
1.0478
sFCM1,0 18.4728 1.0246
sFCM1,1 25.3067 1.0246
sFCM1,2 24.7146 1.0246
ksFCM1,0 31.4829 1.0246
ksFCM1,1 52.5809 1.0246
ksFCM1,2 51.1077 1.0246