Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 2;13(2):113–122. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2019.00990

Table 2.

Pathogenic variants of USH2A and its pathogenic potential according to in-silico analysis and ACMG-AMP guideline

Gene Family ID Variant State Prediction algorithm
Conservation score
MAF
Reported/study ACMG/AMP guideline
Mutation taster PP-2 SIFT PhyloP GERP++ GMAF KRGDB
USH2A (NM_206933) SB 237-461 c.8167C>T: p.R2723X Het DC NA NA 0.953 –0.488 0.00001 (1/121224, ExAC) Absent Reported/Jaijo et al. [23] “Pathogenic” (PVS1, PM2, PM4, PP4)
0.00002 (1/5008, 1000G)
0.00001 (1/125568 TOPMED)
0.000004 (1/245742, GnomAD)
c.1823G>A: p.C608Y Het DC PD D 4.66 4.61 Absent Absent Novel/this study “Uncertain significance” (PM2, PP3, PP4)
SB 354-692 c.14835del: p.S4945fs*4 Het DC NA NA –0.825 –5.19 Absent Absent Novel/this study “Pathogenic” (PVS1, PM2, PM4, PP4)
c.13112_13115del: p.G4371fs*19 Het DC NA NA 4.88 5.12 0.00002 (3/121124, ExAC) 0.00029 (1/3444) Reported/Sengillo et al. [24] “Pathogenic” (PVS1, PM2, PM4, PP4)
0.00003 (4/125568, TOPMED)
0.00001 (3/245602, GnomAD)

ACMG AMP, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology; MAF, minor allele frequency; GMAF, global minor allele frequency; KRGDB, Korean Reference Genome Database; Het, heterozygous; DC, disease causing; NA, not available; ExAC, Exome Aggregation Consortium; PD, probable damaging; D, damaging.