Skip to main content
. 2020 May 23;6(5):e03938. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03938

Table 3.

Effect of drying method on the mean proximate composition (g/100 g ± SD) and percent daily value (% DV) of stinging nettle and spinach∗∗leaves.

Drying method (DM)
Fresh
Freeze dried
Oven dried
p-values
Species (SP) Nettle Spinach Nettle Spinach Nettle Spinach SP DM SP x DM
Moisture 85.0b (1.5) 89.6a (0.6) 6.4c (0.2) 6.6c (0.0) 3.4d (0.1) 4.5d (0.0) 0.01 0.01 0.01
Ash 3.1c (0.3) 1.8c (0.2) 19.5a (0.2) 16.7b (0.5) 19.2a (1.0) 17.0b (0.7) 0.01 0.01 0.23
Macronutrients
Fats 0.6d (0.1) 0.4d (0.0) 3.5a (0.1) 3.2b (0.1) 3.4ab (0.1) 2.8c (0.1) 0.01 0.01 0.15
Available carbohydrates 2.2e (0.2) 2.4e (0.1) 14.7d (0.7) 22.1b (0.6) 18.9c (2.2) 26.1a (0.4) 0.01 0.01 0.01
Fibres 4.6d (0.5) 2.9e (0.2) 27.5a (0.5) 25.4b (0.3) 26.3ab (1.0) 23.8c (0.1) 0.01 0.01 0.50
Proteins 4.6c (0.4) 2.9d (0.1) 28.3a (0.4) 26.0b (0.4) 28.8a (0.4) 25.8b (0.1) 0.01 0.01 0.08
Proteins, g/serving 4.6 2.9 4.2 3.9 4.3 3.9
 % DV 9.2 5.8 8.5 7.8 8.6 7.7

a-d Means within same rowwith different superscripts are different (p < 0.05) when analysed using analysis of variance.

∗∗

Spinach leaves were used as anexternal reference sample.

represent percent contribution from a serving of 100 g fresh or 15 g dried stinging nettle and spinach leaves to the daily value of proteins (50 g) was calculated as described by US FDA (2013) using the following formula:
% DV = Nutrient content in a serving Daily value for the nutrient x 100