Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 27;20(9):2479. doi: 10.3390/s20092479

Table 4.

Performance comparison of vital sign detection algorithms for in-vehicle monitoring.

Vital Sign Assessed Vital Sign Algorithms Research Articles Experimental setup
Range/Subjects/Reference Measurement Method
Results
HR, RR Location based Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD)
[61] Up to 1.5 m (inside car) /2 human/Oximeter
Error rate for only driver HR: 7.34%
Error rate for two targets in car HR: 6.9%–11.5%
RR FFT, band pass filter [84] Inside car/ 3 male, 1 female/manual push button based method Mean error: 1.06 breathing rate per minute
RR, HR FFT, Data fitting method [16] Inside car/5 humans/ECG, respiration belt Mean RR error: 0.2–0.7 beats per minute
Mean HR error: 0.6–2.5 beats per minute
RR, HR FFT, band pass filter [86] Inside chamber/ 1 human/ECG SNR: 8.6 dB
HR FFT, FIR Kaiser filter of order 600, Correlation method [87] Inside car/3 humans/3 lead Olimex EKG (for ECG), a BioHarness 3 (RR) Phase method: 13.1%–22.5%
Correlation method: 14.4%–30.3%
Slow time method: 24.3%–39.4%