Table 2.
AutoDock Vina scores obtained by docking simulations.
| Target. | AutoDock Vina Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| BHT | PFL | FLP a | |
| GABA-AR α+β2- b | −5.6 | −5.3 | |
| GABA-AR β2+α- | −6.6 | −6.1 | |
| GABA-AR α+β3- | −5.3 | −6.6 | |
| GABA-AR β3+α- | 1.5 | −2.5 | |
| 5-HT2BR | −6.3 | −6.5 | |
| 5-HT2CR | −7.0 | −6.3 | |
| COX-1 | −6.1 | −8.5 | |
| hNET | −7.4 | −6.8 | |
| dDAT | −6.5 | −5.9 | |
| hSERT | −7.6 | −6.8 | |
a For GABA-AR the notation α+β2-, β2+α-, α+β3-, β3+α- refers to the different intersubunits interfaces. b For COX-1 docking simulations were performed using BHT and flurbiprofen (FLP), instead of PFL, as ligands. The results obtained for each target is hereby described.