Table 1.
Comparing different clustering protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) with our proposed method. LEACH: low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchy; TEEN: threshold-sensitive energy efficient sensor network protocol; PSO: Particle Swarm Optimization; HSA: Harmony Search Algorithm; CH: cluster head. TPSO-CR: Two-tier PSO protocol for Clustering and Routing. iCSHS: Integrated Clustering for Cuckoo Search and Harmony Search.
| Reference | Clustering Schema | Converge | Energy-Efficient | Cluster Stability |
Event Awareness |
Routing | Clustering Objective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEACH [22] | Random Distributed |
No | Low | Low | No | single-hop | Changing CH based Prob./Random |
| TEEN [40] | Probability Centralized |
No | Medium | Low | No | single-hop | Changing CH based Threshold |
| [23] | PSO-based Centralized |
Low balanced |
Moderate | High | No | single-hop | Energy Efficiency + Min Distance + Node Hop count |
| [41] | HSA-based Centralized |
Low balanced |
Medium | Low | No | single-hop | Energy Efficiency + Min Distance |
| TPSO-CR [27] | PSO-based Centralized |
Moderate balanced |
Moderate | High | No | multi-hop | Energy Efficiency + link Quality + Coverage |
| PSO-HSA [29] | PSO and HSA Centralized |
Moderate balanced |
High | High | No | single-hop | Energy Efficiency + Min Distance |
| iCSHS [42] | Cuckoo-based Distributed |
Moderate balanced |
Moderate | Low | No | multi-hop | Energy Efficiency + Node degree + Intra Distance + Coverage |
| This Paper | PSO and HSA Centralized |
High balanced |
very High | High | Yes | multi-hop | Energy Efficiency + Cluster Closeness + Coverage |