Table 6.

Best configuration for each case study (parameters) followed by the mean, standard deviation and best coverage obtained when testing them in the 30 corresponding scenarios.

Case Study	${\mathit{\tau }}_{\mathit{d}}$	${\mathit{\tau }}_{\mathit{r}}$	${\mathit{\tau }}_{\mathit{a}}$	${\mathit{\tau }}_{\mathit{m}}$	${\mathit{\pi }}_{\mathit{c}}$	${\mathit{\alpha }}_{\mathit{a}}$	${\mathit{\alpha }}_{\mathit{m}}$	${\mathit{\tau }}_{\mathit{u}}$	Coverage (%)
									Mean	StDev	Best
50x50.2	0.01	2	0.26	5	–	–	–	–	85.1	2.8	90.3
50x50.4	0.01	2	0.23	4	–	–	–	–	94.7	0.8	95.7
100x100.4	0.01	2	0.22	8	–	–	–	–	63.5	3.1	69.2
100x100.6	0.01	2	0.38	7	–	–	–	–	77.5	2.9	82.0
50x50.2z1	0.01	2	0.36	4	0.21	0.08	18	0.59	84.6	4.2	89.8
50x50.4z1	0.01	2	0.15	4	0.35	0.06	18	0.67	94.4	1.0	95.6
100x100.4z1	0.01	2	0.15	10	0.22	0.19	7	0.88	62.9	2.6	67.8
100x100.4z2	0.01	2	0.34	8	0.24	0.03	7	0.76	62.9	2.7	67.1
100x100.4z3	0.01	2	0.32	6	0.55	0.17	11	0.75	61.8	3.4	67.4
100x100.6z1	0.01	2	0.35	6	0.35	0.28	7	0.26	76.1	3.2	80.7
100x100.6z2	0.01	2	0.35	7	0.33	0.36	3	0.79	76.4	2.7	83.1
100x100.6z3	0.01	1	0.37	7	0.00	0.06	16	0.82	75.4	2.6	80.6