Table 6.

Analysis of the statistical significance of the respiratory/wheezing SDR, SIR and SAR results comparing the proposed method (IIS-NMPCF) with the other evaluated methods using an one-sided paired t-test in the databases T1L (see Figure 9).

Method	SDR${}_{\mathit{r}}$	SIR${}_{\mathit{r}}$	SAR${}_{\mathit{r}}$	SDR${}_{\mathit{w}}$	SIR${}_{\mathit{w}}$	SAR${}_{\mathit{w}}$
NMF	$2.1\times {10}^{-9}$	$6.8\times {10}^{-12}$	$3.9\times {10}^{-8}$	$2.2\times {10}^{-9}$	$1.5\times {10}^{-12}$	$8.6\times {10}^{-10}$
SNMF	$5.5\times {10}^{-10}$	$3\times {10}^{-11}$	$1.9\times {10}^{-5}$	$1.7\times {10}^{-9}$	$2.7\times {10}^{-12}$	$8\times {10}^{-12}$
SSNMF	$5.3\times {10}^{-10}$	$1.1\times {10}^{-13}$	$6.5\times {10}^{-10}$	$1.2\times {10}^{-9}$	$6.2\times {10}^{-11}$	$3.6\times {10}^{-10}$
2S-NMPCF	$2.8\times {10}^{-10}$	$3.1\times {10}^{-9}$	$4.7\times {10}^{-10}$	$1.1\times {10}^{-8}$	$1.2\times {10}^{-10}$	$9.3\times {10}^{-10}$
1S-NMPCF	$1.8\times {10}^{-9}$	$9.9\times {10}^{-12}$	$5.5\times {10}^{-12}$	$2.1\times {10}^{-8}$	$3.3\times {10}^{-9}$	$2.9\times {10}^{-6}$
T-NMPCF	$1.5\times {10}^{-7}$	$1.7\times {10}^{-8}$	$5.4\times {10}^{-12}$	$1.8\times {10}^{-7}$	$1.2\times {10}^{-7}$	$2.5\times {10}^{-8}$
CNMF	$2\times {10}^{-5}$	$4.4\times {10}^{-4}$	$3.9\times {10}^{-2}$	$4.7\times {10}^{-9}$	$3.4\times {10}^{-4}$	$5.6\times {10}^{-6}$
ST-NMPCF	$5.6\times {10}^{-4}$	$4\times {10}^{-6}$	$3.7\times {10}^{-4}$	$1.9\times {10}^{-6}$	$1.1\times {10}^{-3}$	$5.2\times {10}^{-6}$
IIS${}_0$-NMPCF	$3.6\times {10}^{-2}$	$9.6\times {10}^{-3}$	$3\times {10}^{-6}$	$2.5\times {10}^{-3}$	$2.7\times {10}^{-2}$	$4.3\times {10}^{-3}$

Each cell shows the parameter $\rho$ that represents the probability of setting a statistically significant result. Considering a confidence interval of 95%, small values of $\rho$ < 0.05 indicate that there exists statistical significance of the results evaluated.