Table 6.
Comparison of the inhibition efficiencies (IE) between the the present work’s synthesized surfactant and other previously published surfactants.
| Cationic Surfactants | Concentration | Medium | IE (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z)-2-((1-methyl-1-dodecylpyrrolidin-1-ium-2-ylidene)amino) ethan-1-ol bromide. | 1.25 mM | Slime-forming bacteria in 3.5% (NaCl)salinity | 85.7 | [Present work] |
| Zinc nanoparticles capped by the CS; (Z)-2-((1-methyl-1- dodecylpyrrolidin-1-ium-2-ylidene)amino)ethan-1-ol bromide. | 1.25 mM | Slime-forming bacteria in 3.5% (NaCl)salinity | 88.6 | |
| Manganese nanoparticles capped by the CS; (Z)-2-((1-methyl-1- dodecylpyrrolidin-1-ium-2-ylidene)amino)ethan-1-ol bromide. | 1.25 mM | Slime-forming bacteria in 3.5% (NaCl)salinity | 94.0 | |
| Tin nanoparticles capped by the CS; (Z)-2-((1-methyl-1- dodecylpyrrolidin-1-ium-2-ylidene)amino)ethan-1-ol bromide. | 1.25 mM | Slime-forming bacteria at 3.5% (NaCl) salinity | 96.9 | |
| 2,2′-(1-aminopropane-1,3-diyl)bis(1-(2-aminoethyl)-1dodecyl-4,5-dihydro-1Himidazol-1ium)dichloride(I) and 2,2′-(1-aminoethane- 1,2 diyl)bis(1-(2aminoethyl)-1-dodecyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-1ium)dichlor-ide(II) | Oilfield produced water under sweet conditions | 83.1–88.1 | [60] | |
| 1, 2-Ethanediylbis(alkyldimethylammonium) bromide R = 12, 14 and 16 | 6.0 mM | Seawater | 94, 95.5 and 98.9% |
[61] |
| Bis(2-hydroxy-3-(3-(dodecanoyloxy)propyl dimethylammonio) propyl) alkylamine dichloride R = 4, 6 and 8) |
300 ppm | Formation water | 76.9, 79.5 and 81.3% |
[62] |
| tetradecyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride (TDBAC) and tributyl tetradecyl phosphonium chloride (TTPC) | 600 ppm | Oil-field water | 93.43–64.83 | [63] |