Skip to main content
. 2020 May 26;20:786. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08955-4

Table 6.

Impact of VET school characteristics on student dropout rates (n = 58)

Crude Adjusted e
β estimate 95% CI p-value β estimate 95% CI p-value
VET-level −0.18 −0.27; − 0.10 0.00 −0.23 − 0.39; − 0.07 0.01
Geographical locationa −3.38 −6.70; − 0.06 0.05 −6.22 −12.01; − 0.43 0.04
Danish ethnicity − 0.24 −0,37; − 0.11 0.00 −0.20 − 0.39; − 0.01 0.04
School sizeb 0.00 0.00; 0.01 0.07 −0.00 −0.01; 0.00 0.45
Student agec 0.93 0.39; 1.47 0.00 −0.04 −1.09; 1.02 0.95
School typed
 Food, agriculture and hospitality −3.32 −8.28; 1.64 0.19 −2.55 −14.28; 9.18 0.66
 Care, health, pedagogy 2.05 −1.62; 5.72 0.27 −9.59 −19.90; 0.73 0.07
 Administration, commerce, business −3.36 −6.95; 0.23 0.07 −4.30 −11.92; 3.33 0.26

a Schools located in the western part of Denmark compared to Eastern reference schools

b Number of students, who enrolled a basic program in 2017

c Mean age of students at the school enrolled in 2017

d Schools providing any of the three main subject areas ‘Food’, ‘Care’ or ‘Business’ compared to the reference group ‘Tech and comb.’

e Adjusted for VET-level, geographical location, students’ ethnicity, school size, students’ age, school type and total health promotion capacity score based on managers’ scores