Skip to main content
. 2020 May 26;62:22. doi: 10.1186/s13028-020-00522-6

Table 2.

Consumer emphasis on different factors when evaluating the four castration methods: surgical castration with anesthesia; surgical castration without anesthesia; vaccination against boar taint; no castration

When evaluating the four castration methods, what was more important to you? Animal welfare, food safety or eating quality?
Factor (evaluating methods) All respondents 18–29 years 30–39 years 40–59 years 60+ years
Animal welfare 49 57 54 51 37
Food safety 10 8 12 11 11
Eating quality 13 9 10 12 19
Equally important 24 20 19 24 28
Uncertain 4 6 4 3 5

Consumers were asked to choose only one of the provided choices when answering the question. All values are presented as percentages