Skip to main content
. 2020 May 26;20:467. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05327-x

Table 4.

Men’s preferences for prostate cancer screening based on main effect with interactions logit model

Attribute Total (N = 779*7)
Coefficients P-value
Constant −0.1357 0.1087
ASCopt-ou 0.4164 < 0.0001
PC mortality −76.7004 < 0.0001
False positive −3.0794 < 0.0001
False negative −20.0634 0.0011
Overdiagnosis 4.9651 0.0007
Screening frequency 0.00504 0.8536
Out-of-pocket costs −0.0122 < 0.0001
Effect of informative video
Watching informative video
*no screening option 0.1737 < 0.0001
No informative video access
*false negative −12.1888 0.0046
Interactions with individual characteristics
Low level of health anxiety
*no screening option 0.1563 < 0.0001
*PC mortality 10.0525 0.0485
High level of health anxiety
*no screening option −0.2443 < 0.0001
*PC mortality −13.2117 0.0080
Irregular medical follow-up
*no screening option 0.1523 < 0.0001
Absence of medical research
*no screening option 0.1882 < 0.0001
Being involved in health decision process
*no screening option 0.1602 < 0.0001
No experience of cancer screening (prostate or colorectal)
*no screening option 0.3930 < 0.0001
Having experience of cancer screening (prostate or colorectal)
*PC mortality −15.3020 0.0005
Monthly income < 3000€
*out-of-pocket costs 0.00202 0.0222
Worker status
*no screening option −0.1747 < 0.0001
Managerial status
*no screening option −0.1140 < 0.0001
Single/divorced/widower
*no screening option 0.0969 < 0.0001
Statistical goodness of fit of model
Pseudo R2 0.1110