Table 3.

The effect of RAPS on generic ADL (Models A1–3 N = 128; Models B1–3 N = 130)

	Model A1	Model A2	Model A3	Model B1	Model B2	Model B3
	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)
RAPS, T1	1.02 (0.96–1.09)	1.02 (0.96–1.09)	1.32 (0.96–1.81)	1.02 (0.96–1.09)	1.03 (0.97–1.09)	1.76 (1.09–2.81)*
Functional limitations, T1	2.4 (1.75–3.28)***	2.29 (1.66–3.15)***	2.31 (1.68–3.2)***	2.41 (1.76–3.3)***	2.5 (1.77–3.53)***	2.9 (1.9–4.41)***
External HCB, T1		1.04 (0.99–1.09)	1.05 (0.99–1.11)
RAPS*External HCB			0.99 (0.99–1.00)
GSE, T1					0.89 (0.81–0.98)*	0.88 (0.8–0.97)**
RAPS*GSE						0.98 (0.97–1.00)*
R square	0.35	0.36	0.37	0.35	0.38	0.41

Note. RAPS relative accessibility problem score; ADL activities of daily living; HCB housing-related control beliefs; GSE general self-efficacy; OR odds ratio; CI confidence interval

* p-value ≤0.05 level (2-tailed); ** p-value ≤0.01 level (2-tailed); *** p-value ≤0.001 level (2-tailed)