Skip to main content
. 2020 May 26;15:191. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01709-3

Table 4.

Univariate analyses of patients with or without 30% pain relief by mirogabalin

Variables < 30% pain relief
(n= 50)
≥ 30% pain relief
(n= 113)
pvalue
Age (years) 72.9 ± 11.9 (45–88) 71.3 ± 13.0 (30–94) 0.46a
Sex, female/male 30/20 82/31 0.11b
Diagnosis 0.75b
 LCS 35 83
 CSM 11 17
 LDH 2 7
 CTS 2 6
 Others 0 1
BMI (kg/m2) 22.7 ± 4.2 (18–33) 23.0 ± 3.8 (19–31) 0.79a
DM 4 11 0.72b
NeP score (points) 7.4 ± 2.1 (6–12) 6.6 ± 1.4 (6–12) 0.0047a
Primary doze (mg) 3.1 ± 1.5 (5–10) 3.1 ± 1.1 (5–10) 0.97a
Max dose (mg) 6.6 ± 3.8 (5–30) 6.4 ± 3.8 (5–30) 0.76a
Adverse events 24 (48%) 42 (37.2%) 0.13b
 Somnolence 17 (34%) 27 (23.9%)
 Dizziness 6 (12%) 10 (8.8%)
 Edema 2 (4%) 5 (4.4%)
 Weight gain 1 (2%) 0 (0%)

Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (range) or n (%).

LCS lumbar canal stenosis, CSM cervical spondylotic myelopathy, LDH lumbar disc herniation, CTS carpal tunnel syndrome, BMI body mass index, DM diabetes mellitus, NeP neuropathic pain

a Student’s t-test

b Chi-squared test