Skip to main content
. 2019 May 15;22(6):935–941. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz081

Table 2.

Associations Between Smoking Status and Quadriceps Properties

Men (n = 1888) Women (n = 2581) All sample (n = 4469)
Parameter Coef. 95% CI p Value Coef. 95% CI p Value Coef. (95% CI) p Value for sex interaction
Muscle CSAa, cm2
 Never smokers Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Former smokers –0.10 –0.17 to –0.03 .003 –0.04 –0.11 to 0.03 .26 –0.10 (–0.15 to –0.05) .39
 Current smokers –0.19 –0.33 to –0.05 .009 –0.07 –0.17 to 0.03 .18 –0.09 (–0.17 to –0.01) .003
Muscle attenuationb, HU
 Never smokers Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Former smokers –0.08 –0.16 to –0.01 .038 0.02 –0.05 to 0.10 .54 –0.09 (–0.14 to –0.04) .031
 Current smokers –0.17 –0.34 to –0.01 .045 –0.24 –0.34 to –0.13 <.001 –0.23 (–0.32 to –0.14) .42
Peak torqueb, Nm
 Never smokers Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Former smokers 0.02 –0.05 to 0.09 .59 0.05 –0.03 to 0.12 .22 –0.06 (–0.11 to –0.01) .73
 Current smokers 0.08 –0.08 to 0.24 .31 –0.06 –0.16 to 0.04 .25 –0.04 (–0.13, to 0.05) .08
Maximum RTDb, Nm/s
 Never smokers Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Former smokers –0.02 –0.11 to 0.07 .67 0.03 –0.05 to 0.11 .42 –0.03 (–0.09 to 0.03) .27
 Current smokers –0.06 –0.25 to 0.14 .58 –0.04 –0.16 to 0.08 .49 –0.05 (–0.16 to 0.05) .90

Models were adjusted for age, BMI, % weight change from age 50, physical activity level, impaired mobility, health status, alcohol consumption, cognitive function, and depressive symptoms. BMI = body mass index; CSA = cross-sectional area; Coef.= coefficient; CI = confidence interval; RTD = rate of torque development.

aAdditionally adjusted to % IMAT (intramuscular adipose tissue) area calculated as quadriceps fat area (cm2)/total quadriceps cross-sectional area (cm2) ×100, and muscle attenuation;

bAdditionally adjusted to % IMAT, and muscle area. Outcomes were expressed in z-scores.