Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 27;20(9):2470. doi: 10.3390/s20092470

Table 1.

Analytical performance comparison of previously reported works with carbon nanotubes (CNT) gas sensor.

Materials Fabrication
Method
Targeted
Analyte
Working
Temperature (°C)
Recovery
Time (s)
Ref.
CNT/SnO2 Oxidative functionalization CO RT - [10]
MWCNT/Al2O3 Acid treatment NH3 RT - [11]
F-MWCNTs Acid treatment H2 RT 100 [12]
N-MWCNTs Film deposition NO2 150 2400 [13]
PANI/MWCNTs Oxidative polymerization NH3 RT 35–62 [14]
MWCNTs-COOH Chemical modification Bisphenol A RT 10 [15]
P3CT/CNTs Drop-casting NMPEA RT 40 [16]
CNT/SnO2 Wet chemical method H2 200 >120 [17]
CNT/WO3 Sputter deposition NO2 RT >300 [18]
MWCNTs-WO3NPs Hydrothermal synthetization NO2 RT 1620 [19]
Pt-MWCNTs Sputter deposition C7H8 150 >70 [20]
PANI:CNTs Interfacial polymerization NH3 RT 46 [21]
SWCNTs-Pyrene 3D Hybrid Drop-casting NH3 22 20 [22]

* RT = Room temperature; F-MWCNTs = acid-functionalized MWCNTs; N-CNTs = nitrogen-doped MWCNT; PANI = Polyaniline; P3CT = poly [3-(6-carboxyhexyl)thiophene-2,5-dity]; NMPEA = N-Methylphenethylamine.