Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Collabra Psychol. 2020 Apr 15;6(1):23. doi: 10.1525/collabra.297

Table 7:

Results of multilevel models predicting suppression (N=148, n=1024).

Null Model Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4

γ (SE) γ (SE) γ (SE) γ (SE) γ (SE)
Fixed effects
Intercept 3.89** (0.077) 3.83** (0.122) 3.87** (0.082) 3.89** (0.077) 3.79** (0.13)
Age at study entry 0.036* (0.015) 0.036* (0.014) 0.033* (0.013) 0.049* (0.017)
Education 0.011 (0.032) −0.021 (0.032) −0.007 (0.031) −0.010 (0.032)
Practice effects 0.033 (0.17) 0.11 (0.18)
EF between −2.46* (0.81) −3.03** (0.88)
EF within 0.15 (0.72) 3.23* (1.10)
HRV between 0.031 (0.070) 0.035 (0.072)
HRV within −0.031 (0.021) −0.032 (0.037)
Subjective between −0.005 (0.004) 0.003 (0.005)
Subjective within 0.001 (0.003) −0.002 (0.008)
Random effects

Intercept SD 0.89 0.83 0.88 0.87 0.87
EF within SD - - - - 3.96
HRV within SD - - - - 0.14
Subjective within SD - - - - 0.04
Residual SD 0.67 0.65 0.65 0.67 0.55
Model fit

LL −1233.1 −599.4 −777.8 −1187.6 −385.0
AIC 2472.3 1214.7 1569.6 2389.1 812.0

Note. EF = executive function; HRV = heart rate variability; LL = log likelihood; AIC =Akaike information criterion.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .001.