Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Collabra Psychol. 2020 Apr 15;6(1):23. doi: 10.1525/collabra.297

Table 8:

Results of multilevel models predicting physical activity (N=149, n=948).

Null Model Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4

γ (SE) γ (SE) γ (SE) γ (SE) γ (SE)
Fixed effects
Intercept 9.12** (0.166) 10.61** (0.699) 9.79** (0.603) 9.97** (0.533) 10.19* (0.797)
Gender −0.689 (0.381) −0.549 (0.361) −0.537 (0.320) −0.481 (0.435)
Age at study entry −0.115* (0.036) −0.101* (0.031) −0.114* (0.027) −0.125* (0.041)
Education 0.050 (0.075) 0.050 (0.070) 0.038 (0.064) 0.034 (0.082)
Practice effects −0.585 (0.409) −1.03* (0.461)
EF between 1.05 (1.91) −1.19 (2.20)
EF within 4.94* (2.22) 6.40* (3.17)
HRV between −0.054 (0.155) −0.115 (0.179)
HRV within −0.006 (0.064) −0.041 (0.099)
Subjective between 0.022* (0.009) 0.034* (0.013)
Subjective within 0.012 (0.008) 0.001 (0.022)
Random effects

Intercept SD 1.83 1.78 1.76 1.66 1.73
Residual SD 1.89 1.90 1.89 1.90 1.91
Model fit

LL −2086.5 −1000.7 −1284.5 −2019.9 −625.1
AIC 4179.1 2019.3 2585.0 4055.9 1276.2

Note. Gender is coded 1=males, 2=females. Results (Models 3 and 4) remain unchanged when excluding the observations that had inconsistent subjective self-regulation scores. EF = executive function; HRV = heart rate variability; LL = log likelihood; AIC =Akaike information criterion.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .001.