Skip to main content
. 2020 May 7;12123:105–120. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-49461-2_7

Table 3.

Table comparing the performance of different methods based on SemEval-2016 dataset with in-sample, out-of-sample and 10-fold cross-validation accuracy.

Out-of-sample In-sample Cross-validation
Accuracy Accuracy Accuracy St. dev.
mOnt 78.31% 75.31% 75.31% 0.0144
wOnt 72.80% 70.80% 70.90% 0.0504
sOnt 76.46% 73.92% 73.87% 0.0141
mOnt + CABASC 85.11% 82.73% 80.79% 0.0226
mOnt + LCR-Rot-hop 86.80% 88.21% 82.88% 0.0224
sOnt + CABASC 83.16% 79.53% 72.04% 0.1047
sOnt + LCR-Rot-hop 84.49% 86.07% 79.73% 0.0348

wOnt stands for a similar semi-automatic ontology built with the same methods as sOnt but with words (instead of synsets) as terms.