Table 3.
Hierarchical multiple linear regressions including the applicability of signature character strengths in work (ASCS-W) and private life (ASCS-P) into the possession (VIA-120) and subjective/psychological well-being (SWB / PWB) relation
Outcome: SWB | Model 1 |
Model 2 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | β | R2 | R2-change | β | p total | N | ||
Fairness | VIA-IS 120 | .205 | .453** | .221 | .016 | .390** | .005 | 91 |
ASCS-W | .053 | |||||||
ASCS-P | .118 | |||||||
Honesty | VIA-IS 120 | .093 | .305** | .130 | .037 | .251* | .007 | 75 |
ASCS-W | .102 | |||||||
ASCS-P | .139 | |||||||
Judgment | VIA-IS 120 | .054 | .232* | .128 | .074 | .168 | .020 | 76 |
ASCS-W | –.089 | |||||||
ASCS-P | .287* | |||||||
Kindness | VIA-IS 120 | .105 | .324** | .142 | .037 | .260* | .012 | 75 |
ASCS-W | .164 | |||||||
ASCS-P | .070 | |||||||
Love | VIA-IS 120 | .047 | .217 | .113 | .066 | .119 | .034 | 55 |
ASCS-W | .177 | |||||||
ASCS-P | .215 | |||||||
Outcome: PWB | ||||||||
Fairness | VIA-IS 120 | .344 | .586*** | .438 | .094* | .440*** | <.001 | 91 |
ASCS-W | .188 | |||||||
ASCS-P | .243* | |||||||
Honesty | VIA-IS 120 | .135 | .368*** | .279 | .143*** | .288** | <.001 | 75 |
ASCS-W | .295** | |||||||
ASCS-P | .166 | |||||||
Judgment | VIA-IS 120 | .162 | .403*** | .286 | .123** | .295** | <.001 | 76 |
ASCS-W | –.013 | |||||||
ASCS-P | .370** | |||||||
Kindness | VIA-IS 120 | .167 | .408*** | .230 | .063 | .329** | <.001 | 75 |
ASCS-W | .227 | |||||||
ASCS-P | .071 | |||||||
Love | VIA-IS 120 | .099 | .314** | .177 | .078* | .273* | .003 | 55 |
ASCS-W | .263* | |||||||
ASCS-P | .111 |
Notes: bold = significant; p-values for β, R2 -changes and total = * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001; p total values = significance of model 2 in total (possession and applicability in work & private life taken into account), N = number of participants