Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 26.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Res Qual Life. 2019 Jan 13;15(2):415–436. doi: 10.1007/s11482-018-9699-8

Table 3.

Hierarchical multiple linear regressions including the applicability of signature character strengths in work (ASCS-W) and private life (ASCS-P) into the possession (VIA-120) and subjective/psychological well-being (SWB / PWB) relation

Outcome: SWB Model 1
Model 2
R2 β R2 R2-change β p total N
Fairness VIA-IS 120 .205 .453** .221 .016 .390** .005 91
ASCS-W .053
ASCS-P .118
Honesty VIA-IS 120 .093 .305** .130 .037 .251* .007 75
ASCS-W .102
ASCS-P .139
Judgment VIA-IS 120 .054 .232* .128 .074 .168 .020 76
ASCS-W –.089
ASCS-P .287*
Kindness VIA-IS 120 .105 .324** .142 .037 .260* .012 75
ASCS-W .164
ASCS-P .070
Love VIA-IS 120 .047 .217 .113 .066 .119 .034 55
ASCS-W .177
ASCS-P .215
Outcome: PWB
    Fairness VIA-IS 120 .344 .586*** .438 .094* .440*** <.001 91
ASCS-W .188
ASCS-P .243*
    Honesty VIA-IS 120 .135 .368*** .279 .143*** .288** <.001 75
ASCS-W .295**
ASCS-P .166
    Judgment VIA-IS 120 .162 .403*** .286 .123** .295** <.001 76
ASCS-W –.013
ASCS-P .370**
    Kindness VIA-IS 120 .167 .408*** .230 .063 .329** <.001 75
ASCS-W .227
ASCS-P .071
    Love VIA-IS 120 .099 .314** .177 .078* .273* .003 55
ASCS-W .263*
ASCS-P .111

Notes: bold = significant; p-values for β, R2 -changes and total = * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001; p total values = significance of model 2 in total (possession and applicability in work & private life taken into account), N = number of participants