Table 4.

Hierarchical multiple linear regressions including the applicability of signature character strengths at work (ASCS-W) into the possession (VIA-120) and work engagement (WE), emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP) and reduced personal accomplishment (RPA) relation

Outcome: WE		Model 1		Model 2
		R2	β	R2	R2-Change	β	p total	N
Fairness	VIA-120	.105	.324*	.213	.108**	.250	.002	93
	ASCS-W					.337**
Honesty	VIA-120	.020	.142	.120	.100**	.126	.003	80
	ASCS-W					.317**
Judgment	VIA-120	.052	.229*	.103	.051*	.171	.019	79
	ASCS-W					.233*
Kindness	VIA-120	.043	.208	.069	.026	.173	.064	76
	ASCS-W					.164
Love	VIA-120	<.001	.009	.163	.163***	.034	.001	56
	ASCS-W					.404***
Outcome: EE
Fairness	VIA-120	.003	−.057	.056	.053	−.004	.225	89
	ASCS-W					−.235
Honesty	VIA-120	.001	.032	.029	.028	.044	.282	77
	ASCS-W					−.168
Judgment	VIA-120	<.001	.017	.072	.072*	.089	.071	76
	ASCS-W					−.277*
Kindness	VIA-120	<.001	−.011	.048	.048	.039	.163	74
	ASCS-W					−.224
Love	VIA-120	.002	−.048	.010	.008	−.052	.688	55
	ASCS-W					−.089
Outcome: DP
Fairness	VIA-120	.001	−.029	.029	.028	.010	.464	89
	ASCS-W					−.173
Honesty	VIA-120	.002	−.042	.024	.022	−.031	.358	77
	ASCS-W					−.148
Judgment	VIA-120	.009	−.095	.089	.080*	−.018	.037	76
	ASCS-W					−.293*
Kindness	VIA-120	.025	−.159	.033	.008	−.138	.284	74
	ASCS-W					−.093
Love	VIA-120	.002	.041	.003	.001	.039	.898	55
	ASCS-W					−.036
Outcome: RPA
Fairness	VIA-120	.079	−.281*	.155	.077*	−.217	.012	89
	ASCS-W					−.284*
Honesty	VIA-120	.026	−.160	.068	.042	−.146	.048	77
	ASCS-W					−.206
Judgment	VIA-120	.143	−.378**	.161	.018	−.343**	.002	76
	ASCS-W					−.138
Kindness	VIA-120	.104	−.322**	.115	.011	−.298*	.011	74
	ASCS-W					−.107
Love	VIA-120	.006	−.078	.046	.040	−.089	.178	55
	ASCS-W					−.201

Notes: bold = significant; p-values for β, R² -changes and total = * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001; p total values = significance of model 2 in total (possession and applicability in work life taken into account), N = number of participants