Skip to main content
. 2020 May 26;10:8701. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64919-z

Table 3.

Comparison of PCR amplification and sequencing success rate from the traditional PCR and Sanger Sequencing approach and the MEBarcoding results from this study.

Marker # successful sequences from MEBarcoding # successful sequences from Sanger sequencing Average pairwise distance between MEBarcoding & Sanger
rbcL 91/96 94 99.59%
matK 58 71 99.3%
trnH-psbA 83 88 97.56%
ITS 64 67 95.57%

When available, sequences from both approaches were compared and a pairwise identity score is provided.