TABLE 3.
Comparison of fungal genus in different vegetable rotations and continuous tomato cropping substrates (t-test).
Genus | log2FC | p-value |
B/CK | (*p < 0.05) | |
Cladosporium | 1.17 | 0.0495* |
Pseudogymnoascus | –7.36 | 0.0495* |
Verticillium | 5.52 | 0.0495* |
Microascaceae_unclassified | –1.28 | 0.0495* |
Gibberella | –2.05 | 0.0495* |
Chaetomiaceae_unclassified | –0.64 | 0.0495* |
Ascomycota_unclassified | –3.36 | 0.0495* |
Pyrenochaeta | –2.58 | 0.0495* |
Acremonium | –0.74 | 0.0495* |
Sarocladium | 1.09 | 0.0495* |
Fusarium | –2.21 | 0.0495* |
Davidiella | 0.88 | 0.0495* |
Emericellopsis | –1.31 | 0.0495* |
Sordariomycetes_unclassified | –1.84 | 0.0495* |
Scopulariopsis | –2.09 | 0.0495* |
Hypocreales_Incertae_sedis_unclassified | 1.36 | 0.0495* |
Genus | log2FC | p-value |
D/CK | (*p < 0.05) | |
Cladosporium | 1.34 | 0.0495* |
Plectosphaerella | –3.08 | 0.0495* |
Pseudogymnoascus | –2.01 | 0.0495* |
Microascaceae_unclassified | –1.02 | 0.0495* |
Gibberella | –1.24 | 0.0495* |
Ascomycota_unclassified | –3.16 | 0.0495* |
Humicola | 5.55 | 0.0495* |
Pyrenochaeta | –4.04 | 0.0495* |
Emericellopsis | –1.48 | 0.0495* |
Sordariomycetes_unclassified | –2.27 | 0.0495* |
Scopulariopsis | –1.94 | 0.0495* |
Hypocreales_Incertae_sedis_unclassified | 2.61 | 0.0495* |
Genus | log2FC | p-value |
Q/CK | (*p < 0.05) | |
Pseudogymnoascus | –4.33 | 0.0495* |
Gibberella | –0.77 | 0.0495* |
Ascomycota_unclassified | –2.57 | 0.0495* |
Mortierella | 1.34 | 0.0495* |
Humicola | 3.12 | 0.0495* |
Pyrenochaeta | –1.08 | 0.0495* |
Sarocladium | 2.19 | 0.0495* |
Hypocreales_Incertae_sedis_unclassified | 4 | 0.0495* |
*Significant at the 0.05 probability level. B, D, Q, and CK are defined in Figure 1. FC in log2 FC is fold change, which represents the ratio of the expression amount between two samples (groups). After taking the logarithm based on 2, it is log2 FC.