Table 2.
Summary results of the intergroup comparisons.
| X | y | z | No. of voxels | T-test/F-test | Z | Cluster corrected pFDR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBD vs CON | LH superior frontal gyrus | −18 | 57 | 30 | 28 | 3.86 | 3.64 | .030 |
| ALL vs CON | LH cingulum | 3 | −15 | 39 | 23 | 10.18 | 4.17 | .004 |
| LH supplementary motor area | 0 | 15 | 54 | 14 | 8.51 | 3.77 | .021 | |
| FD and IBS vs CON | LH supplementary motor area | −3 | 12 | 57 | 14 | 11.54 | 3.87 | .043 |
Anatomical labels according to Automated Anatomical Labeling tool. All reported clusters are significant at cluster p < .05 threshold with topological False Discovery Rate small volume correction.
CON, the control group; FD, the functional dyspepsia group; IBS, the irritable bowel syndrome group; IBD, the inflammatory bowel disease group; ALL, all diseases (FD, IBS and IBD); x, y, z, peak coordinates in MNI space; Z, Z-score.