Skip to main content
. 2020 May 20;148:e98. doi: 10.1017/S0950268820001107

Table 2.

Comparing the differences between two groups (direct treatment vs. non-direct treatment)

Variables Group 1 (direct contact treatment) Group 2 (non-direct contact treatment) Standardise diff. P value
N 348 164
Anxiety score 38.83 ± 8.38 41.11 ± 9.79 0.25 (0.06–0.44) 0.007
Gender 0.26 (0.07–0.44) 0.005
Female 305 (87.64%) 128 (78.05%)
Male 43 (12.36%) 36 (21.95%)
Age group 0.13 (−0.06 to 0.31) 0.283
18–39 260 (74.71%) 126 (76.83%)
40–59 88 (25.29%) 37 (22.56%)
⩾60 0 (0.00%) 1 (0.61%)
Education 0.17 (−0.01 to 0.36) 0.223
Middle school or lower 1 (0.29%) 1 (0.61%)
High school or higher 20 (5.75%) 4 (2.44%)
College or higher 327 (93.97%) 159 (96.95%)
Marital status 0.11 (−0.08 to 0.29) 0.524
Single 120 (34.48%) 65 (39.63%)
Married 223 (64.08%) 97 (59.15%)
Divorced 5 (1.44%) 2 (1.22%)
Department 0.90 (0.70–1.09) <0.001
Clinical department 255 (73.28%) 114 (69.51%)
Fever clinic 20 (5.75%) 48 (29.27%)
Administration 73 (20.98%) 2 (1.22%)
Hubei province 0.92 (0.73–1.12) <0.001
No 336 (96.55%) 103 (62.80%)
Yes 12 (3.45%) 61 (37.20%)
Location 0.04 (−0.14 to 0.23) 0.667
Countryside 6 (1.72%) 2 (1.22%)
City 342 (98.28%) 162 (98.78%)
Suspect case 0.65 (0.46–0.84) <0.001
No 342 (98.28%) 129 (78.66%)
Yes 6 (1.72%) 35 (21.34%)
Satisfaction with community prevention 0.24 (0.05–0.43) 0.008
No 326 (93.68%) 142 (86.59%)
Yes 22 (6.32%) 22 (13.41%)
Need psychological treatment 0.21 (0.03–0.40) 0.019
No 322 (92.53%) 141 (85.98%)
Yes 26 (7.47%) 23 (14.02%)