Skip to main content
. 2020 May 20;11:788. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00788

TABLE 5.

Results of the multiple regression model applied to each subject.

Multiple regression model
Patients β distance (normalized) β composite frequency (normalized) R R2 Adjusted R2 p β composite/β distance
George −0.295 0.709 0.864 0.746 0.717 <0.0001 2.403
Primo −0.373 0.697 0.896 0.803 0.781 <0.0001 1.869
Secondolo −0.405 0.663 0.896 0.803 0.781 <0.0001 1.637
Terzio −0.149 0.806 0.872 0.761 0.734 <0.0001 5.409
Jan −0.369 0.673 0.873 0.762 0.735 <0.0001 1.823
Lisa −0.476 0.645 0.928 0.861 0.845 <0.0001 1.355
Margareth −0.452 0.676 0.941 0.885 0.872 <0.0001 1.495
Sarah −0.220 0.763 0.869 0.754 0.727 <0.0001 3.468
Mean 0.343 0.704 0.892 0.797 0.774 <0.0001 2.432

Therapists β distance (normalized) β composite frequency (normalized) R R2 Adjusted R2 p β composite/β distance

George 0.271 1.006 0.888 0.789 0.754 <0.0001 3.712
Primo −0.036 0.827 0.845 0.714 0.667 <0.001 22.972
Secondolo 0.057 0.915 0.89 0.793 0.758 <0.0001 16.052
Terzio −0.025 0.784 0.798 0.638 0.577 <0.002 31.36
Jan −0.069 0.892 0.927 0.859 0.835 <0.0001 12.927
Lisa −0.056 0.750 0.782 0.612 0.547 <0.003 13.393
Margareth 0.109 0.875 0.831 0.690 0.639 <0.001 8.027
Sarah 0.031 0.877 0.862 0.743 0.700 <0.0001 28.29
Mean 0.035 0.866 0.853 0.730 0.684 <0.001 17.092