Table 2.
Findings and Quality Assessment of Studies Reporting Original Quantitative Data
| Source | Methodology and population | Main findings | Quality assessment5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bo et al.7 | Cross-sectional survey of 714 Chinese COVID-19 survivors before discharge from a quarantine facility |
|
Weak |
| Cao et al.8 | Cross-sectional survey of 7143 Changzhai medical students in China |
|
Weak |
| Castro and Perlis9 | Electronic medical records review of 2,689,116 patient encounters in Massachusetts, United States |
|
Strong |
| Chung and Yeung10 | Cross-sectional survey of 69 full-time staff in Hong Kong, China |
|
Weak |
| American Psychiatric Association11 | Cross-sectional survey of 1004 residents in the United States |
|
Weak |
| Lai et al.12 | Cross-sectional survey of 1257 health care workers in Hubei, in Wuhan, outside of Wuhan, China |
|
Weak |
| Liu et al.13 | Cross-sectional survey of 285 residents and visitors in Wuhan, China |
|
Weak |
| Lu et al.14 | Cross-sectional survey of medical and administrative staff in Fujian, China |
|
Weak |
| Qiu et al.15 | Cross-sectional survey of 52,730 residents in China |
|
Weak |
| Wang et al.16 | Cross-sectional survey of 1210 members of the general public in China |
|
Weak |
| Zhang et al.17 | Cross-sectional survey of 2182 medical and nonmedical workers in Wuhan, China |
|
Weak |
| Zhu et al.18 | Cross-sectional survey of 5062 health care workers in Wuhan, China |
|
Weak |