Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 21;44(1):213–223. doi: 10.3892/or.2020.7590

Table II.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis for OS in CRC patients.

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


Variates Categories HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
Sex Female vs. Male 1.212 (0.706–2.081) 0.485
Age >60 vs. ≤60 years 1.504 (0.826–2.736) 0.182 1,810 (0.954–3.435) 0.069
Differentiation Poor vs. Well/Moderate 1.904 (0.758–4.787) 0.171 1.150 (0.433–3.053) 0.779
pT T4 vs. T1-3 1.557 (0.899–2.697) 0.114 1.489 (0.823–2.694) 0.189
pN N1-3 vs. N0 2.782 (1.610–4.809) <0.001b 0.300 (0.061–1.463) 0.136
TNM stage III–IV vs. II 3.092 (1.776–5.383) <0.001b 9.067 (1.781–46.152) 0.008b
MSH2 expression High vs. Low 0.635 (0.359–1.122) 0.118 0.760 (0.412–1.402) 0.760
MSH6 expression High vs. Low 0.554 (0.220–1.392) 0.209
RAD18 expression High vs. Low 2.365 (1.361–4.110) 0.002b 1.809 (1.005–3.256) 0.048a
a

P<0.05

b

P<0.01; Fisher's exact test was performed. OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; p, pathological staging; TNM, Tumor-Node-Metastasis; MSH2, mutS homolog 2; MSH6, mutS homolog 6; RAD18, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase.