Skip to main content
. 2020 May 1;31(6):1068–1077.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.04.021

Table 3.

Hazard Ratios for Outcomes in Well-Controlled and Poorly Controlled BG Cohorts under Cox Adjusted Model and Propensity Score-Matching Model

Well-Controlled versus Poorly Controlled Unmatched
Matchedb
Crude
Adjusteda
Adjustedc
HR (95% CI) p Valued HR (95% CI) p Valued HR (95% CI) p Valued
All-cause mortality 0.09 (0.03,0.30) <0.001 0.13 (0.04,0.44) <0.001 0.14 (0.03,0.60) 0.008
Septic shock
ARDS 0.31 (0.19,0.50) <0.001 0.41 (0.25,0.66) <0.001 0.47 (0.27,0.83) 0.009
DIC
Acute kidney injury 0.19 (0.04,0.80) 0.024 0.22 (0.05,1.03) 0.055 0.12 (0.01,0.96) 0.046
Acute heart injury 0.14 (0.05,0.39) <0.001 0.21 (0.07,0.59) 0.003 0.24 (0.08,0.71) 0.010

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

a

In mixed-effect Cox model, adjusted variables for comparing BG well-controlled and BG poorly controlled cohorts included age, gender, indicators of the severity of COVID-19, and comorbidities (hypertension, coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular diseases, chronic liver diseases, and chronic renal diseases)

b

In the propensity score-matched model, age, gender, hospital sites, indicators of the severity of COVID-19, comorbidities (hypertension, coronary heart disease, cerebral vascular disease, chronic liver disease, and chronic renal diseases), and incidence of increased creatinine were matched

c

Mixed-effect Cox model using the hospital site as a random effect and adjusting imbalanced durations from symptom onset to admission

d

p values were calculated based on Cox proportional hazard model