Skip to main content
. 2020 May 27;40(22):4401–4409. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2463-19.2020

Table 2.

Significant effects of the different EV models, across hi_ID and no_ID conditions, during the room-choice perioda

Contrast Region Peak MNI Cluster size
IDEV (Hi_ID>No_ID) Mid-cingulate 0, 2, 28 1232
Anterior cingulate 2, 38, 18
RLPFC 26, 50, 14
Left premotor −26, 8, 52 1256
Correlation between above contrast and behavioral choice preferences Right STG
Right LOFC
Right insula
Right IFG
62, −4, 4
46, 52, 0
40, 12, 2
52, 36, 0
2907
Left STG −44, −12, 0 1938
Left insula −38, −4, 6
Left LOFC −44, 34, −14
Left IFG −54, 22, 6
$ EV (Hi_ID-No_ID) (-) Right precentral/postcentral gyrus 40, 2, 38 2134
Right IFG 34, 12, 32
Right MTG 64, −46, 12 1523
Right ITG 52, −62, 4
Left lingual gyrus −28, −92, −14 1340
Left cerebellum −12, −58, −16
polEV (Hi_ID>No_ID) (-) Left precentral/postcentral gyrus −34, −30, 70 1157

aSnPM-corrected cluster sizes are shown in the fourth column, with empty rows indicating that a cluster is continuous with that listed above. (-), Negative correlation; STG, superior temporal gyrus; LOFC, lateral orbitofrontal gyrus; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus.