Skip to main content
. 2020 May 26;4(10):2286–2296. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001816

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

Characteristics Training cohort (n = 86) Validation cohort (n = 64) P
Sex, male/female, n 44/42 31/33 .512
Age, median (range), y 71 (24-90) 74 (33-86) .019
ECOG performance status <.01
 0 or 1 81 (94) 45 (70)
 ≥2 5 (6) 19 (30)
Ann Arbor stage <.01
 I or II 54 (63) 12 (19)
 III 11 (13) 13 (20)
 IV 21 (24) 39 (61)
Extranodal sites .281
 0 60 (70) 22 (34)
 ≥1 26 (30) 42 (66)
Bone marrow involvement .541
 Yes 10 (12) 11 (17)
 No 76 (88) 53 (83)
B symptoms .330
 Yes 12 (14) 29 (58)
 No 74 (86) 35 (42)
LDH .285
 ≤Normal 45 (52) 21 (33)
 >Normal 41 (48) 43 (67)
TMTV, cm3 .411
 Median (range) 167.23 (4.61-5445.50) 236.32 (76.62-677.09)
 ≥150 44 (51) 26 (41)
 ≥150 42 (49) 38 (59)
MH (AUC-CSH) 1.000
 Median (range) 0.48 (0.24-0.93) 0.49 (0.33-0.75)
 Low (>0.48) 43 (50) 32 (50)
 High (≤0.48) 43 (50) 32 (50)
NCCN-IPI .014
 Low or low-intermediate 47 (55) 15 (24)
 High-intermediate 33 (38) 20 (31)
 High 6 (7) 29 (45)
Treatment <.01
 R-CHOP 81 (94) 27(42)
 R-THP-COP 5 (6) 36 (56)
 R-CVP 0 (0) 1 (2)
Response
 CR 67 (78) 41 (64) .069
 PR 4 (5) 8 (13) .126
 SD 11 (12) 9 (14) .814
 PD 4 (5) 6 (9) .326
Follow-up, mo
 Median (range) 33.1 (3.6-97.3) 32.8 (1.4-111.5)

Unless otherwise noted, data are n (%).

ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PD, progressive disease; R-CHOP, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone; R-CVP, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone; R-THP-COP, rituximab, therarubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone; SD, stable disease.