Table 4. Interactions underlying HLA class I disease associations in Crohn’s disease cases.
AH8.1 is associated with increased odds of good prognosis amongst Crohn’s disease cases. In our cohort two classical HLA class I alleles from this haplotype, B*08:01 and C*07:01 are associated with good prognosis (Appendix 3—table 7). For both B*08:01 and C*07:01 we sought to determine the underlying mechanism by performing 5 multivariate linear regressions (model 2–6), one for each of the distance metrics. The coefficient (Coeff) and P value for the index allele and the similarity metric are recorded below. Gender was included as an additional covariate in all models. A coefficient <0 indicates a protective effect (P, decreased odds of poor prognosis), a coefficient >0 indicates a detrimental effect (D, increased odds of poor prognosis). Despite good power, similar alleles by all 5 metrics were never significantly protective (indeed in some cases tended towards being detrimental e.g. similar alleles by TCR or LILRB1 binding). Inclusion of 3 non-MHC SNPs which were significant in a GWAS as covariates did not alter these conclusions. Significance codes: p<0.001 ***; p<0.01 **; p<0.05 *; p<0.1. ; P values are two tailed.
|
Index allele | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | COV. | B*08:01 | C*07:01 | |||
1. Index only |
index | Coeff | −0.50 P |
−0.34 P |
||
P val | 3.56 × 10−7
**** |
0.0003 *** |
||||
2. Index+TCR.FS |
Index | Coeff | −0.49 | −0.34 | ||
P val | 9.96 × 10−7
**** |
0.0008 *** |
||||
TCR.FS | Coeff | 0.65 D |
0.041 D |
|||
P val | 0.20 | 0.84 | ||||
3. Index+iKIR.FS |
Index | Coeff | −0.50 | −0.34 | ||
P val | 3.75 × 10−7
**** |
0.0007 *** |
||||
iKIR.FS | Coeff | −0.08 P |
0.02 D |
|||
P val | 0.89 | 0.86 | ||||
4. Index+aKIR.FS |
Index | Coeff | −0.50 | −0.34 | ||
P val | 3.56 × 10−7
**** |
0.0003 *** |
||||
aKIR.FS | Coeff | 0 | 0.001 D |
|||
P val | 1 | 0.99 | ||||
5. Index+LILRB1.S |
Index | Coeff | −0.50 | −0.28 | ||
P val | 1.46 × 10−6
**** |
0.007 ** |
||||
LILRB1.S | Coeff | −0.001 P |
0.28 D |
|||
P val | 1 | 0.09 . |
||||
6. Index+LILRB2.S |
Index | Coeff | −0.50 | −0.28 | ||
P val | 2.28 × 10−6
**** |
0.007 ** |
||||
LILRB2.S | Coeff | 0.007 P |
0.28 P |
|||
P val | 0.98 | 0.11 |