Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 13;49(3):475–489. doi: 10.1007/s10936-020-09703-w

Table 3.

Correlations between raw scores on narrative ability, assessed with the three sub-scores information, sentence length and subordinate clauses from the bus story test (BST), and raw scores on language and nonverbal cognitive variables

Variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1. Age (years)
2. Information (BSTa) .44**
3. Sentence length (BST) .51*** .78**
4. Subordinate clauses (BST) .41** .81*** .81***
5. Receptive grammar (TROG-2) .55** .70*** .61*** .60***
6. Recalling sentencesb (CELF-4) .35* .71*** .57*** .59** .64**
7. Nonverbal cognitive ability .39** .43** .49*** .40** .57** n.s
8. Nonverbal temporal sequencing .48*** .45** .55*** .39** .56** .34* .47***
9. NAP totalc .48 ** .83*** .79*** .76*** .61*** .60*** .46** .45**

Correlations were performed using Spearman’s Rho correlation

n.s. not significant

*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001

aThe bus story test

bSubtest CELF-4 total score

cNarrative discourse profile