. 2020 Mar 19;27(6):1573–1579. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.03.019

Table 4.

Number and weight of bunches and effective fruit bodies in second and third flush.

Treatment	NB flush 2	NB flush 3	NEFB flush 2	NEFB flush 3	WB (g) flush 2	WB (g) flush 3	WEFB (g) flush 2	WEFB (g) flush 3
T0	5.0^c	–	14.0^bc	–	67.8^b	–	19.0^b	–
T0′	3.3^abc	3.0^ab	9.0^a	6.3^b	74.9^bc	51.2^d	19.6^b	33.4^c
T1 C1t1	4.0^bc	3.3^b	12.7^b	7.0^b	82.1^c	23.9^a	21.1^b	11.3^a
T2 C1t2	2.0^a	6.0^c	13.0^bc	13.0^c	125.8^e	25.1^a	19.1^b	10.2^a
T3 C2t1	4.3^bc	1.7^a	16.0^c	7.0^b	110.5^d	84.7^f	18.8^b	11.5^a
T4 C2t2	4.7^bc	2.0^ab	12.3^b	7.0^b	40.5^a	34.2^b	13.3^a	12.6^a
T5 C1t3	4.0^bc	8.0^d	8.7^a	15.0^c	75.6^bc	41.4^c	25.9^c	18.7^b
T6 C2t3	3.0^ab	2.0^ab	9.0^a	2.7^a	50.0^a	70.6^e	25.6^c	44.5^d

NB: Number of bunches, WB: weight of bunches, NEFB: number of effective fruit bodies, WEFB: weight of effective fruit bodies.

(Means within the same column followed by the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test).