. 2020 Mar 19;27(6):1573–1579. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.03.019

Table 6.

Economic and biological yields and biological efficiency in second and third flushes.

Treatment	BY (g/bag) flush 2	EY (g/bag) flush 2	BY (g/bag) flush 3	EY (g/bag) flush 3	Total BY (g/bag)	Total EY (g/bag)	BE (%)
T0	281.5^d	252.5^d	–	–	719.6^bc	667.8^bc	81.4^bc
T0′	233.2^c	201.5^c	136.8^d	115.2^c	799.5^bcd	691.5^bcd	90.0 ^cd
T1 C1t1	273.7^d	236.6^d	82.2^b	72.4^b	695.9^b	625.6^b	78.4^b
T2 C1t2	288.4^d	252.6^d	180.2^e	160.2^e	771.9 ^cd	703.2 ^cd	86.9^bcd
T3 C2t1	313.7^e	292.4^e	118.7^c	78.6^b	736.8^bc	661.9^bc	83.0^bc
T4 C2t2	197.4^b	173.8^b	57.9^a	51.9^a	543.3^a	479.7^a	61.2^a
T5 C1t3	204.3^b	179.4^b	332.7^f	283.1^f	973.4^e	854.0^e	109.6^e
T6 C2t3	152.2^a	132.8^a	141.2^d	133.5^d	828.8^d	743.9^d	93.3^d

BY: Biological yield and EY: Economic yield.

Means within the same column followed by the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.