Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 6;7(1):e001226. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001226

Table 2.

Atrial fibrillation treatment strategy in rate/rhythm control and anticoagulant use at the intensive care unit and at hospital discharge for new-onset atrial fibrillation patients with AF documented in the discharge letter (n=159)

Characteristic
CHA2DS2-VASc score, median (95% CI) 3 (3 to 4)
HAS-BLED score, median (95% CI) 2 (2 to 3)
Rhythm/rate control, n (%)
 Initiated at the ICU (n=159)
  Amiodarone IV administered 109 (68.6)
  Digoxin administered 142 (89.3)
  Verapamil administered 0 (0.0)
  Beta-blocker administered 50 (31.4)
   Oral rate/rhythm control medication at ICU discharge* 87 (55.1)
   AF unresolved 63 (39.6)
 Hospital discharge (n=135)
  Rhythm/rate control medication 87 (64.4)
   AF unresolved 82 (60.7)
   Unknown rhythm 63 (46.7)
Anticoagulant initiated, n (total %; % of eligible patients)
 Initiated at the ICU (n=159) 43 (27.0; 25.3)
  Therapeutic LMWH 36 (22.6)
  VKA 5 (3.1)
  NOAC 2 (1.3)
 Hospital discharge (n=135) 68 (50.4; 56.3)
  Therapeutic dose LMWH 7 (5.2)
  VKA 38 (28.1)
  NOAC 23 (17.0)
 One year after hospital discharge (n=99) 36 (36.4; 38.3)

*Oral rate/rhythm control included: amiodarone, beta-blockers, digoxin, verapamil.

AF, atrial fibrillation; ICU, intensive care unit; IV, intravenously; LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin; NOAC, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; VKA, vitamin K oral antagonist.