Skip to main content
. 2020 May 26;8(1):e000586. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000586

Table 2.

Association between GZMB genotype and clinical outcome

Parameter Test variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
PFS
GZMB c.128T>C CC+CT vs TT 1.39 (1.07 to 1.80) 0.013* 1.38 (1.02 to 1.87) 0.036*
 WHO 0 vs ≥1 0.66 (0.46 to 0.95) 0.027* 0.61 (0.42 to 0.89) 0.01*
 Sex Male vs female 1.38 (1.06 to 1.80) 0.018* 1.29 (0.95 to 1.76) 0.103
OS
GZMB c.128T>C CC+CT vs TT 1.19 (0.91 to 1.57) 0.212
 WHO 0 vs ≥1 0.52 (0.35 to 0.77) 0.001*
 Sex Male vs female 1.40 (1.05 to 1.86) 0.023*
Parameter  Test variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
BOR
GZMB c.128T>C CC +CT vs TT 1.63 (1.04 to 2.57) 0.033* 1.60 (1.01 to 2.52) 0.044*
 Primary tumor Other vs adeno 0.63 (0.40 to 0.98) 0.041* 0.63 (0.41 to 0.99) 0.045*

Univariate and multivariate analysis of the association of germline variation of GZMB and PFS, OS, or BOR. Patient factors associated with OS/PFS (p value<0.1) were included in the multivariate analysis. Significance is marked by *.

BOR, best overall response; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; WHO, WHO performance status.