Table 2.

Interview themes and categories.

Theme	Categories and subcategories
1. Wider context	1.1 Municipality’s context and political climate 1.2 Bottom-up versus top-down push for eHealtha 1.3 Municipality values 1.3.1. Staying close to the citizen 1.3.2 Sustainability 1.3.3 Valuing volunteers 1.4 Societal factors 1.4.1 Self-management in health care 1.4.2 Sustainable integration with daily practice 1.4.3 Brand value 1.4.4 Increased needs for dementia care 1.4.5 Political support for digital future
2. Organization	2.1 Internal: The municipality 2.1.1 Implementation strategies 2.1.2 Attitudes 2.2 External: Collaboration with local organizations 2.2.1 Emphasize added value to external organization 2.2.2 Improving quality of care 2.2.3 Financial sustainability planning
3. Users	3.1 Caregivers 3.1.1 Dissemination: Through media, convincing through personal contact, gaining attention, events 3.1.2 Involving users 3.1.3 Personalization 3.1.4 Involvement in the implementation 3.2 Coaches 3.2.1 Difficult to find/train/guide coaches 3.2.2 Resource shortage 3.3 Lack of users’ digital abilities 3.3.1 Caregivers 3.3.2 Coaches
4. Intervention	4.1 Thoughts on eHealth 4.1.1 Must keep modules up to date 4.1.2 The Netherlands and Scandinavia at the forefront 4.1.3 Risks around data leaks 4.1.4 More familiarity with data systems than with apps 4.1.5 Easier to reach people than traditional interventions 4.2 Experiences with eHealth 4.2.1 As a database for patient information 4.2.2 In an educational context 4.2.3 In the media 4.2.4 No experience 4.3 Expectations about future success of intervention implementation 4.3.1 Ideal situation 4.3.2 Expectations

^aeHealth: electronic health.