Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 25;48(3):0300060520903889. doi: 10.1177/0300060520903889

Table 2.

Comparison of the scores for the two screening tools used to predict osteoporosis, the osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) and the osteoporosis screening tool for Chinese women (OSTC), compared with bone mineral density (BMD) measurements from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in postmenopausal female patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 404) stratified according to age.

Age, years Weight, kg n OSTA OSTC
Lumbar spine (L1–L4)

Left femoral neck
BMD T-score BMD T-score
50–59 60.0 ± 9.1 67 1.03 ± 1.92 0.36 ± 10.71 1.06 ± 0.19 –0.46 ± 1.55 0.89 ± 0.11 –0.31 ± 0.93
60–69 59.8 ± 10.0 156 –1.02 ± 2.09 –20.01 ± 11.54 0.96 ± 0.19 –1.28 ± 1.54 0.78 ± 0.12 –1.28 ± 1.01
70–79 58.8 ± 10.1 131 –3.10 ± 2.12 –39.73 ± 11.68 0.91 ± 0.17 –1.69 ± 1.44 0.70 ± 0.13 –1.94 ± 1.09
≥80 57.4 ± 9.1 50 –5.47 ± 2.00 –62.14 ± 11.98 0.91 ± 0.19 –1.66 ± 1.56 0.65 ± 0.14 –2.37 ± 1.16
All 59.2 ± 10.1 404 –1.90 ± 2.83 –28.24 ± 21.89 0.96 ± 0.19 –1.32 ± 1.57 0.75 ± 0.15 –1.47 ± 1.22

Data presented as mean ± SD.