Table 5.
Facilitators, barriers and recommendation affecting health system in conflict areas of Pakistan
Facilitators | Barriers | Recommendations | |
---|---|---|---|
Health Workforce | - Hiring of qualified local people along with incentives for retention | - Lack of female health workers | - Hire more female staff and reduce gender imbalance |
- Absenteeism and lack of capacity of healthcare staff | |||
- Workers hired from outside face language and cultural issues | - Send female staff on rotation basis to conflict areas | ||
- Political influence and favoritism | - Hire local people and provide adequate training | ||
- Security threats | - Provide housing and basic necessities | ||
- Low salaries | - Merit based hiring | ||
- Absence of accommodation and basic facilities for doctors | - Doctors or staff to provide replacements when going on leave | ||
- Quacks are preferred by people over doctors | |||
Service Delivery | - Secondary facilities relatively well maintained | - Non-functional healthcare facilities | - SOPs should be implemented |
- Establishment of various new primary and secondary healthcare facilities | - Poor infrastructure | - Work on infrastructure for the uptake of health care intervention | |
- Political influence | |||
- Ambulatory service with staff care | - Quality of care compromised | - Stringent monitoring mechanisms using technology | |
- Midwives and lady health workers visit homes | - Unavailability of transport for staff | ||
- Service of institutional deliveries in presence of skilled birth attendant | - Changing demographic pattern | - Improve community awareness and mobilization activities | |
- No arrangements for transport of complicated cases | |||
- Social mobilization activities | - Improving LHWs functionality | ||
Supplies and Commodities | - Different donors provide different supplies and services | - Curfews during the conflict blocked supplies to the facilities | - Procurement decisions at the district level |
- Procurement systems to simplified and made efficient | |||
- Enough supplies were provided | - Insufficient supply for commonly used drugs | ||
- Delay in supplies from government | - Strict monitoring | ||
- Supplements sold in open market | |||
- Allocation of budget for medicines not revised according to present needs | |||
- Absence of diagnostic facilities | |||
Monitoring and Reporting | - Before and after surveys sometimes conducted | - Poor quality of data | - Promote E-Health |
- Internal monitoring was done | - No record of training or equipment distribution | - Improve quality of data | |
- Third party monitoring on monthly basis for Polio | - Preference of manual work over computer use | - Do situational analysis before implementation | |
- DHIS system for reporting | - Data not used for decision making | - Data to be used for decision | |
Finances | - Funding is done by donors and the government | - Delay in release of funds from the donors | - To ensure sustainability of funding for existing programs |
Cluster meetings | - Seminars held for coordination | - Not regularly held for most programs | - Regular cluster meetings for all issues |
- Regular meetings held for Polio at district and provincial level | - Improve communication between center and district | ||
Natural Disaster | - Disaster management authority present at provincial level | - Improve the functionality | |
- Nutrition plan for emergency situations present | |||
Epidemics | - Disease Surveillance and Response Unit in FATA | - Proper forecasting and pre-emptive measures |
LHW, Lady Health Workers, SOPs Standard Operating Procedure, MnE Monitoring and Evaluation, DHIS District Health Information System