Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Neural Eng. 2020 Jan 14;17(1):016027. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab549d

Figure 3: Across 13 trials in 10 subjects, correlations between model-predicted electric field using either conventional or emulated CSF values with in vivo recorded values.

Figure 3:

Models using emulated CSF conductivity were better correlated to experimental measures compared to models using conventional CSF conductivity (p=0.008, t(12)=3.17). Each line represents a trial (montage and subject combination) and each marker represents a subject. One subject (diamond marker) was assessed under four different montages.