Table 3.
Nutrient Measure | Attenuation Factor | 95% CI | Correlation With True Intake | 95% CI | Mean Difference From Reference Tool, % | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nutrient intake, g | ||||||
Protein | ||||||
Oxford WebQ | 0.27 | 0.17, 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.27, 0.52 | 12 | 6, 19 |
MPRb | 0.33 | 0.24, 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.36, 0.57 | 8 | 3, 14 |
Potassium | ||||||
Oxford WebQ | 0.31 | 0.18, 0.44 | 0.34 | 0.20, 0.47 | 53 | 42, 64 |
MPR | 0.35 | 0.22, 0.48 | 0.37 | 0.25, 0.49 | 47 | 37, 57 |
Total sugars | ||||||
Oxford WebQ | 0.31 | 0.18, 0.44 | 0.33 | 0.20, 0.46 | −25 | −18, −32 |
MPR | 0.16 | 0.01, 0.30 | 0.15 | 0.01, 0.30 | −32 | −25, −39 |
Total energy expenditure, MJ | ||||||
Oxford WebQ | 0.22 | 0.12, 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.18, 0.46 | −22 | −17, −27 |
MPR | 0.30 | 0.17, 0.42 | 0.36 | 0.22, 0.49 | −22 | −18, −27 |
Nutrient densityc, g/MJ | ||||||
Protein | ||||||
Oxford WebQ | 0.34 | 0.17, 0.51 | 0.29 | 0.16, 0.42 | 46 | 37, 55 |
MPR | 0.26 | 0.10, 0.42 | 0.23 | 0.09, 0.36 | 41 | 32, 50 |
Potassium | ||||||
Oxford WebQ | 0.33 | 0.12, 0.54 | 0.23 | 0.09, 0.37 | 99 | 83, 115 |
MPR | 0.41 | 0.23, 0.59 | 0.33 | 0.19, 0.46 | 91 | 77, 106 |
Total sugars | ||||||
Oxford WebQ | 0.32 | 0.15, 0.50 | 0.27 | 0.13, 0.41 | −3 | 8, −12 |
MPR | 0.16 | −0.03, 0.35 | 0.13 | −0.02, 0.28 | −12 | −1, −21 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; MPR, multiple-pass recall.
a Data for all dietary measures and estimates were log-transformed.
b Interviewer-based multiple-pass 24-hour dietary recall.
c Nutrient density for protein, potassium, and total sugars was expressed in grams per MJ of total energy intake.