. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 28.

Published in final edited form as: J Prosthodont. 2018 May 9;28(1):e364–e375. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12908

Table 1.

Mean surface roughness, monoclinic volume fraction measured by standard incidence XRD, transformations depth, flaw size, flexural strength, and Weibull parameters of various surface treatment groups

Groups	Root mean square surface roughness: Rq (μ<m) (Mean ± SD)	Highest average surface roughness: Rz (μm) (Mean ± SD)	Flaw size (μm) (Mean ± SD)	Standard incidence XRD monoclinic volume fraction (%) (Mean ± SD)	GIXRD phase transformation depth (μm) (Mean ± SD)	FDS depth (μm) (Mean ± SD)	Flexural strength (MPa) (Mean ± SD)	Weibull modulus: m (Mean ± SD)	Characteristic strength: σ_θ (MPa)

AS	0.5 ± 0.1^a	2.9 ± 0.7^a	5.8 ± 1.0^a	traces	N/A	N/A	1202.3 ± 141.9^a	9.0 ± 0.6^b	1275.7
AAF	0.7 ± 0.1^b	3.7 ± 0.8^b	5.9 ± 1.8^a	16.0 ± 1^b	14.5 ± 1.2^a	19.3 ± 1.1^a	1662.6 ± 202.6^b	9.8 ± 0.3^a,b	1755.4
AAC	1.1 ± 0.2^c	6.2 ± 1.6^c	40.3 ± 20.3^b	19.0 ± 2^c	47.2 ± 3.0^b	41.2 ± 2.2^b	1371.4 ± 147.6^c	11.2 ± 0.4^a	1428.3
G	1.0 ± 0.4^c	5.4 ± 1.5^c	18.6 ± 3.1^c	16.0 ± 1^b	8.6 ± 1.5^c	19.8 ± 3.7^a	1357.0 ± 196.7^c	8.3 ± 0.3^b	1446.2
GP	0.3 ± 0.1^e	0.9 ± 0.5^e	2.6 ± 1.8^d	traces	N/A	9.3 ± 2.0^d	1567.2 ± 209.7^b	8.4 ± 0.3^b	1663.9

Within columns, identical letters denote no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05)