Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 1;9(1):1744947. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1744947

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Neoantigen load and BRCA1/2 mutation status, BRCA subtypes and immune subtypes. (a) BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status and overall mutation burden. Left panel: patients with known deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations (labeled as Mutated, dark purple) had suggestive higher overall mutation burden than patients without (labeled as WT, light purple) (p = .067). Right panel: patients with known deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline and somatic mutations (labeled as Mutated, dark blue) had significantly higher overall mutation burden than patients without (labeled as WT, light blue) (p = 2.67E-06). (b) BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status and neoantigen load. Left panel: patients with known deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations (labeled as Mutated, dark yellow) did not show significant difference in neoantigen load from patients without (labeled as WT, light yellow). Right panel: patients with known deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline and somatic mutations (labeled as Mutated, dark green) had significantly higher neoantigen load than patients without (labeled as WT, light green) (p = .009). (c) Breast cancer subtype and neoantigen load. Significant differences in neoantigen load were found between Basal and LumA (p = 4.04E-05), Her2 and LumA (p = .005), LumA and LumB (p = 4.31E-06), and LumA and Normal (p = .0003). (d) Immune subtype and neoantigen load. Significant differences in neoantigen load were found between C1 and C3 (p = .01), C2 and C3 (p = .001), and C1 and C6 (p = .03).