Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 28.
Published in final edited form as: BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 May 18;26(4):262–270. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004697

Table 3.

Patient characteristics associated with report of ‘feeling better’ about their doctor as a result of reading their notes (N=3298)*

Characteristic % Felt much better/somewhat better Adjusted RR 95% CI
Age (years)
  <47 32 1
  47–55 35 0.96 0.85 to 1.08
  56–63 37 1.07 0.94 to 1.21
  >63 42 1.15 1.01 to 1.31
Sex
  Male 42 1.31 1.19 to 1.45
  Female 32 1
Race
  Non-white 44 1.25 1.07 to 1.46
  White 35 1
Education
  HS/GED 44 1.39 1.21 to 1.60
  Some college 41 1.33 1.19 to 1.50
  College/postgraduate 31 1
Self-reported health
  Fair/poor 44 1.14 1.00 to 1.30
  Good 36 1.01 0.93 to 1.11
  Very good/excellent 32 1
Site
  Site 2 38 1.08 0.99 to 1.19
  Site 3 54 1.12 0.089 to 1.40
  Site 1 34 1
Total notes available
  1 31 1
  2 34 1.03 0.90 to 1.18
  3 35 1.04 0.87 to 1.25
  4 39 1.17 0.96 to 1.43
  ≥5 43 1.31 1.15 to 1.50
Notes accurately describe the visit
  Always/usually 36 1.86 1.21 to 2.85
  Sometimes/never 20 1
Ease of understanding notes
  Very/somewhat easy 36 1.16 0.94 to 1.42
  Very/somewhat difficult 32 1
*

Multivariable logistic regression model including all the predictors shown in the table, controlled for providers and site.

Age ranges were defined by quartiles.

Derived from postintervention patient survey questions: ‘How often did notes accurately describe the visit?’ and ‘How easy was it to understand your notes?’.

Note: Model excluding patients with missing demographic data.

RR, risk ratio.