Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 23.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 30;382(17):1619–1628. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1916374

Table 2.

Estimated Mean Effect of an Invasive Strategy on SAQ Summary Scores.*

Month Overall (N = 705) Daily or Weekly Angina at Baseline (N = 83) Monthly Angina at Baseline (N = 276) No Angina at Baseline (N = 345)
points (95% credible interval)
3 2.1 (−0.4 to 4.6) 10.1 (0.0 to 19.9) 2.2 (−2.0 to 6.2) 0.6 (−1.9 to 3.3)
6 0.5 (−2.2 to 3.4) 9.2 (−1.6 to 19.7) 0.3 (−4.3 to 4.8) −0.8 (−4.0 to 2.3)
12 0.1 (−3.0 to 3.1) 2.2 (−8.0 to 13.1) 1.0 (−4.0 to 6.2) −0.8 (−4.2 to 2.8)
18 1.3 (−1.8 to 4.2) 2.0 (−8.7 to 12.9) 2.4 (−2.7 to 7.5) 0.2 (−2.9 to 3.4)
24 2.4 (−0.7 to 5.7) −0.5 (−12.0 to 10.2) 4.3 (−1.0 to 9.6) 1.4 (−1.9 to 4.7)
30 1.4 (−1.7 to 4.6) 0.1 (−11.3 to 12.0) 2.9 (−2.2 to 8.2) 0.7 (−2.5 to 4.0)
36 0.5 (−3.6 to 4.5) 0.7 (−13.8 to 16.2) 1.5 (−5.1 to 8.2) 0.0 (−4.2 to 4.3)
*

Data are estimated mean differences between the invasive-strategy group and the conservative-strategy group in the SAQ Summary score, according to angina frequency at baseline (as assessed with the SAQ Angina Frequency score) and time point.