Table 3.
Comparison of efficiency scores of sgRNAs for the DAK1 short sequence from five different sgRNA design applications: CHOPCHOP, CRISPRseek, CRISPOR, GuideScan and crispRdesignR. Only the efficiency scores for the top 5 guide sequences from each program are shown.
| Guide Sequence | CHOPCHOP22,23 | CRISPRseek25 | CRISPOR21 | GuideScan24 | crispRdesignR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAGGGACCAGCGTAATGGAG | 63.75 | 64 | 68 | 0.660 | |
| CGTAATGGAGGGGTTAGCAA | 64.17 | 0.728 | 64 | 63 | 0.605 |
| TCAGGGACCAGCGTAATGGA | 57.25 | 0.623 | 57 | 59 | 0.575 |
| TGCTAACCCCTCCATTACGC | 58.74 | 0.283 | 59 | 56 | 0.522 |
| GCGTAATGGAGGGGTTAGCA | 56 | 0.507 | |||
| TTCAGGGACCAGCGTAATGG | 56.3 | 56 | |||
| TGTGACTTCAAACGATTTAG | 0.577 | ||||
| CAGTCAATTCAAGTCTCAAA | 0.321 |