Skip to main content
. 2020 May 20;2020:9641582. doi: 10.1155/2020/9641582

Table 2.

Biochemical analysis of rabbits from NDG (n = 8), FDG (n = 8), and RFG (n = 8) analyzed at the end of the 3-month fat diet.

NDG (n = 8) FDG (n = 8) RFG (n = 8) F P value
Weight (kg)# 2.90 ± 0.08 2.98 ± 0.15 2.96 ± 0.07 1.160 0.333
ALT 44.81 ± 7.95 50.86 ± 24.53 61.06 ± 20.26 1.506 0.245
AST# 40.51 ± 6.46 84.32 ± 54.94 77.91 ± 24.54a 3.668 0.043
CREA 77.38 ± 10.45 111.92 ± 11.38a 127.63 ± 10.84a,b 44.526 <0.001
TG 0.62 ± 0.21 0.90 ± 0.42 0.76 ± 0.28 1.567 0.232
TC# 2.19 ± 0.30 30.32 ± 5.74a 11.84 ± 2.78a,b 120.264 <0.001
HDL# 1.03 ± 0.20 3.28 ± 1.61a 1.58 ± 0.35a 11.946 <0.001
LDL 0.91 ± 0.22 16.45 ± 3.16a 6.23 ± 1.53a,b 120.880 <0.001
Lp-PLA2# 520.14 ± 51.55 1928.88 ± 385.78a 953.20 ± 96.66a,b 77.698 <0.001

#The test result of homogeneity of variance was P < 0.05, and Dunnett's T method was used for multiple comparison of P value correction, while the Bonferroni method was used for the other indicators. NDG, normal diet group; FDG, fat diet group; RFG, fat diet with resveratrol; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CREA, creatinine; TG, triglycerides; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Lp-PLA2, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2. aStatistically significant when compared to NDG at P < 0.05. bStatistically significant when compared to FDG at P < 0.05.