Skip to main content
. 2020 May 28;19:75. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00576-3

Table 3.

Characteristics of physicians’ and patients’ symptom ratings and degree of rater agreement

Symptom No. of assessments (paired N) Characteristics of ratings by physicians (HOPE-SP-CL) and patients (MIDOS/IPOS) Rater agreement by symptom/problem
Physicians
n (%)
presenta
Patients
n (%)
presenta
Percentage of actual agreementb Kappa (ƙ) Strength of agreementc
Pain 355 234 (65.9) 232 (65.4) 54.7 .438 Moderate
Nausea 348 106 (30.5) 113 (32.5) 73.9 .394 Fair
Vomiting 346 63 (18.2) 71 (20.5) 78.1 .297 Fair
Dyspnea 351 143 (40.7) 141 (40.2) 76.1 .503 Moderate
Constipation 342 152 (44.4) 151 (44.2) 62.8 .248 Fair
Weakness 351 330 (94.0) 315 (89.7) 84.3 -.009 Not significant
Appetite loss 350 269 (76.9) 236 (67.4) 72.3 .318 Fair
Tiredness 349 239 (68.5) 264 (75.6) 63.1 .088 Not significant
Anxietyd 348 179 (51.4) 142 (40.8) 56.0 .125 Poor
Tensione 338 231 (68.3) 166 (49.1) 54.7 .101 Poor
Sleeping problemsf 346 132 (38.2) 194 (56.1) 59.0 .202 Poor

HOPE-SP-CL, Symptom and Problem Checklist of the German Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation

MIDOS, New version of the minimal documentation system for patients in palliative care

IPOS, Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale

adichotomized symptoms: “not present”= no/mild (HOPE-SP-CL) or none/little (MIDOS/IPOS); “present”= moderate/severe (HOPE-SP-CL) or moderate/severe/overwhelming (MIDOS/IPOS)

bPercentage of ratings matched (both ratings either yes or no)

cAs per Landis and Koch 1977

dstudy-specific item added to IPOS

estudy-specific item added to MIDOS and IPOS

fstudy-specific item added to MIDOS, IPOS and HOPE-SP-CL